Similar Posts

9 Comments

  1. I would like to know how to find resident owned mobile home parks vs. ones on which you rent lots. My other half is afraid of having a park sold out from under us and we are retired an can’t afford to move a double wide mobile home.
    Thank you
    P.S. I would like to get the newsletter, but I can’t get the sign up on the web site to cooperate. Can you please sign me up?

  2. Hi Queenie!

    Your community sounds wonderful! I think as the baby boomers start retiring they will catch on that mobile home living is a great choice to downsize and live on less. Hearing about parks like yours certainly helps break the stigma. Thank you so much for sharing!

  3. Greetings all, We live in a 55+ Community. It is considered a condominium complex. Each person owns the lot their home sits on but all green belts, pools etc are community. Our HOA fee is $180.00 per month. That includes trash and water and common area upkeep. I feel like I live in a resort. The streets are wide; landscaping is nice; clubhouse is great but best of all for me is the pool which is 88-90 degrees year round! We are in San Diego County and since you own the lot it is not cheap but compared to standard house prices in this area it is a bargain. I also don’t understand why other boomers aren’t jumping in. We are near shopping and healthcare. Age Range is 55 to over 100! I bought in 2012 at age 56; one of the best decisions I have ever made. Have put on a new roof; thermal windows; wood stove and Vinyl plank floors in bedrooms. Bathrooms were already updated and laminate floor was already in kitchen, dining and family room. We put new carpet in living room.My living room overlooks one of our green belt areas, it is about 2 acres. Lots of bird watching.Find a real estate agent that sells mobile homes, they know the good parks and which are ROC. There are a few other resident owned parks in Northern San Diego county that I know of. We even have a fenced doggie park!

  4. Hi Arlene! Thank you for visiting and commenting! Your home sounds amazing – that’s exactly the type of community I want to retire in. Resident-owned communities just makes so much sense. I’m so glad it’s becoming more common.
    Thanks for sharing!

  5. I live in a 55+ park in Tucson, Arizona. We are a for-profit, resident-owned cooperative. The homes are all quite nice, the park is clean and up to date, and our space fees range from $145 a month for single wide to $165 for triple wide lots, as per the shares associated with the lots. It is a GREAT way to live. It is like living in a small town, and you see your friends and other members on a daily basis. About half our residents leave in the summer, leaving the place all the the rest of us! I bought a 1983 14×70 for $39,900. We have fixed and updated, and added a ‘she shed’ and fencing to our place, and likely if were to sell, would list for $65,000. Our electric and our water/sewer are all billed through the park, and are very cheap because the usual fees that are standard on every bill are shared rather than individual. We have 2 pools (one indoors), a jacuzzi, 2 9′ pool tables, a restaurant class kitchen, library, etc. Comanche Wells is a great place to live. And we are within a mile of all shopping, and near first class medical facilities as well. I wish there were better ways of finding out which parks in different states are resident owned and function like ours. With the economical costs of each, we could afford to own another mobile home in – say – Oregon, New Mexico, or maybe even Texas.

    Thank you Crystal for this website! I visit it regularly.

  6. Hi Gerald!

    You make a very good point. I’ve read a few stories about parents leaving their homes to the kids but they failed to do the proper paperwork so the park ends up getting to keep the home. It’s a sad situation all the way around.

  7. I suspect that with many elderly residents, they have a greater fear of pricing themselves out of a home than they have of a declining park. It’s a “let me get my life over with and then you can do whatever you want with the place” attitude. Until then, they refuse to encourage anything that they believe has the potential of improving things so much that they can’t afford living there any more.

    The selling feature for any upgrade/improvement plan has to be the increased value that the owner can pass to others with very little investment on their part. But the clincher, to them, is what is “very little investment.” Many feel they can’t afford an increase of $10 a month on their fixed incomes. That is why many older parks, even resident owned, don’t turn into the Ritz. Price security is more important than aesthetics and and promises of future reward.

  8. Hi Bill,

    We have lived in a 55+, deeded lot, ROC here in the Northern California Gold Country town of Sutter Creek for around 3 years now. This community was originally developed as a ROC back in the early 1970’s. According to several long time Owners when it was originally developed it was a really upscale nice place. Forward almost 5 decades it now has a few issues. Due to the low real estate values a percentage of the places have fallen into disrepair. The median home value in the area is probably $400K or so. An older singlewide in here is probably worth $100K and a doublewide $130K. We have deeded lots here but co-own the common areas including the streets, pool, clubhouse.

    We bought our place as is even though the CCR’s clearly state they are to be brought to a “first Class” state prior to sale. We took our 1973 singlewide down to a skeleton leaving only the framing and roof and started with a clean slate. After $25K and 1000 sweat equity hours everything is new, efficient and up to date now.

    While I can’t reasonably expect everyone to do what we did we still have a lot of room to improve as a community. We probably have 10% full replaced and another 5% fully modernized like ours. With the value disparity between the areas homes and our Community I really can’t figure out why more Baby Boomers aren’t purchasing and upgrading here.

    I served on the Board and was the Architectural Committee until the first of this year. I didn’t seek Board re-election as we travel 4 to 6 months every year. Part of the new regime tried to boot me off My Architect Committee Chair position stating I was considered too aggressive. After several letters back and forth I decided to quit. This after watching the many upkeep and modernization actions I had requested reaching a 75% or so response level. I understand several of the new Board Members decided we needed to be kinder and gentler. My Professional Life for 40+ years was as a heavy Construction Superintendent. I always had to straddle a fence between our Owner/Clients and our Subcontractors. So I would describe myself as more of a Passive/Aggressive personality. This style didn’t work with the New Regime I guess. Time will tell if their style will produce any results.

    My early take on the New Regime is they are living in LaLa land. Even during my tenure on the Board I felt the Community members who dug in hard were allowed to run the show while the Board hid in a corner. Looking through the Owner files there were only several enforcement actions ever attempted. Unfortunately, the conscientious Owner’s are being damaged by this.

    Don’t get me wrong, this community is far from being a slum. Unfortunately, due to the age I feel it could easily become one if a Community wide firm stance isn’t taken. There is a similar Community around 15 miles away that has seen property values double in the last 3 years and looks really nice when you drive through. I used this community as a reference point multiple times in my conversations with other Community Owners. They still were reluctant.

    Somewhat as a comfort I will do a Google Street view of the Community. The Street Views are from 2007. There has been a significant improvement in that time but the steady decline and holdouts are still here.

Comments are closed.